Urbanisation in Sub-Saharan Africa
A huge amount of African cities are expected
to be affected by the impact of climate change, such as storm flooding, costal
erosion, rising sea levels, inundation and obstructed drainage (Parnell
and Walawege 2011). Indeed, scientists predict an increasing occurrence of
certain events, leading to infrastructural damage, sanitation and water systems
damage, impacts on transportation and tourism, African urbanisation is rising
up high. Relating to my previous post, the population in Africa is growing very
fast and has reached an entire population of more than one billion in 2015 (World Bank, 2015).
Even though Africa is the least urbanised continent, it’s supposed to have a
higher number of urban population than North America, Latin America or Europe (Parnell
and Walawege 2011).
Figure 1: Rural and urban population growth
Africa and Europe. Source: (Parnell
and Walawege 2011).
Considering figure 1, Africa has a nearly
exponentially growth, whereas the European development seems to stagnate in the
future. Currently, one-third of urban growth Africa is caused by migration, as
two-thirds are initiated by an above-average fertility rate. 20% of the total
global refugees are to be found in Africa; 45% of these are internally displaced
(Parnell
and Walawege 2011). This can be effected by certain reasons like conflicts
or war, but at least some displacements are assumed to be caused environmental hazards
determined by climate change. Migration decisions are made of social, cultural,
political, economic or environmental factors. For instance, migration is often a
response to environmental change, that upcoming yield decrease and crop failure
is raising economic pressure.
Figure 2: Urban and Rural population movement
in 2009. Source: (Parnell
and Walawege 2011).
Examining figure 2, urbanisation is not a
usually common pattern, it depends on certain backgrounds as I mentioned
before. Indeed, in certain countries, urban to rural migration is much more commonplace
than rural to urban migration. A movement or a relocation can also be temporary
and as a positive adaptive response to livelihoods. Nowadays, for instance, one
could migrate to buffer disaster and climate change risk (Parnell
and Walawege 2011). As McGranahan claims: “It is likely that as a
consequence of climate change this movement will increase and intensify, and
possibly become more permanent. What is not clear is whether it will result in
the growth of informal settlements inhabited by impoverished migrants and nonmigrants
in persistent conflict” (McGranahan et al., 2009, p. 12). Certain motivations
for migration differ, as they are caused by divergent encouragements, but it is
likely referring to McGranahan, that environmental changes could foster further
migration movements.
The listed push and pull factors below,
shows motivations of migratory movements:
Pull factors for population movements:
-
Economic and social benefits
influence urban growth
-
Services like subsidised
housing
-
Low skilled job opportunities
-
Economic growth of cities attracts
migratory movements
Push factors for population movements:
-
Famine and droughts pushing the
poor off
-
Loss of land and agricultural mechanisation
-
Poverty and rural conflicts
leads people to drive off
-
Advantage of social environment
in cities
Urbanisation itself, is a big challenge,
but it gets worse during the increasing growth. Cities are more likely to be
vulnerable to natural hazards. Feasible risks, such as flooding or rising sea
level will occur due to within bigger population. As I explained the upcoming urban
growth in Africa, my next post will deal with the occurring risks in urban
regions.
References:
International Organisation Migration (2009):
Migration, Environment and
Climate Change: Assessing the Evidence.
McGranahan, G., Mitlin, D., Satterthwaite, D.,
Tacoli, C., Turok, I. (2009): Africa’s
Urban Transition and the Role of Regional
Collaboration, Human Settlements
Working Paper Series Theme: Urban Change-5,
IIED, London, p. 58.
Even though there are large challenges with the expansion of urban areas and its impacts on water resources, I think that there are also some advantages such as a better distribution system (compared to distributing water from village to town ect). Are there any other advantages that you can think of?
ReplyDeleteHello Hong To,
DeleteThank you for your question. Of course there are many advantages in cities compared to small villages, such as a better distribution system, but as I mentioned in this post, migratory movements underline other motivations (economic and social benefits, subsidised housing etc.). Incentives for water supply, potentially is on a lower, because migrants (rural to urban) expect a get a new job and to benefit from certain governmental support. I’m sorry, that didn’t answer your question, to give you further advantages, but my intention was, to highlight motivation of migratory movements and the general city growth to continue my post with “Migratory movements in Africa II”. I recommend you to read my hyperlinked blogpost, to get a better understanding of my intention. Please do not hesitate to write a comment if you have any further questions.
Cheers,
Julian
Hyperlink is not working...
DeleteTherefore: https://waterandenvironmental.blogspot.de/2016/12/migratory-movements-in-africa-ii.html